Green buildings have been in the
works for quite some time now,
especially in facilities run by
the Government Services Administration,
the largest real estate manager in the
world.
So-called “Green Lease paragraphs”
date back to executive orders of 1998 and
1999, promoting greening the government.
In July 2000, PX-2000-02 was issued.
This provided GSA realty
specialists with leasing, energy, and environmental
business practices, as well as
the SFO language needed to comply with
the executive orders.
It also supplied instructions on how
to apply correct green language, based on the individual nature and type of
procurement.
A GSA document, filename SFO_8-29-
08.pdf, is a template that GSA can use on
behalf of all agencies, as a Solicitation for
Offer for leasing office space. This is a
60-page document that sets out many
standards.
Of special interest is paragraph 9.6-
A…, which says the Lessor shall control
contaminants at the source and/or operate
the space in such a manner that the GSA
indicator levels for carbon monoxide
(CO), carbon dioxide (CO2), and
formaldehyde (HCHO) are not exceeded.
The indicator levels for office areas shall be: CO 9 ppm time weighted average
(TWA 8 hour sample); CO2 1,000 ppm
(TWA); HCHO 0.1 ppm (TWA).
There are several issues with this paragraph
that will be addressed in subsequent
numbered items. Measurements of CO
and CO2 in commercial occupancies, for
HVAC control, are generally done with
in-duct detectors, such Greystone or GE
Sensing.
GE Sensing provides the Telaire lowcost
infrared CO2 unit—priced at under
$500. Vaisala also provides an in-duct
infrared CO2 unit. AirTest Technologies
is yet another supplier of in-duct infrared
CO2 units. Note that these units are also
available in wall-mount configurations,
from all suppliers. Greystone provides
separate units for both CO and CO2,
presumably priced in the same range.
All commercially-available CO2 units
mentioned above will accommodate the
1000 ppm requirement, at least in that this
value is well within the usual 0-2000 ppm
measuring range. However, any calculation
of TWA would have to be done by
the building management system.
Initial inquires to Andover Controls
(now TAC) suggest that while such reporting
could certainly be accomplished, it
is not standard at this time. To be sure,
they have done much work with the pharmaceutical
industry, whereby logs of temperature
and humidity—with peaks and
some averaging—are required.
CO measurement is another matter. The
typical HVAC-configured CO monitor
does not have sufficient sensitivity to meet
the 9 ppm requirement. For example, the
Greystone unit has a range of 0-300 ppm
with accuracy of ±10 ppm or ±5 percent
of reading—whichever is greater.
Let me tell you about mechanical engineering
consultant Rick Ritner’s sticker
shock when he found out what our
formaldehyde monitors cost, compared to
the typical HVAC stuff. Imagine how he
would like to buy a Gas Filter Correlation
CO unit, which is really the only
technology recommended for low CO
measurements.
I suppose we could look at our own
stuff, with extra signal conditioning—
since the word “maintenance” does not
seem to exist in these applications.
What was GSA Thinking of Here?
As to HCHO, everything said about CO would apply, but even if price
were no object, there is really not a
suitable unit for this application. We
had recommended to Ritner—and I
have already mentioned to GSA—the
use of a portable unit for intermittent
survey work, or in response to tenant
complaints.
I suppose the same course could be recommended
for the low CO requirement.
Contacts at GSA seem to think that
the levels stipulated in Section 9.6-A of
the SFO are “suggestions,” but many
people are already calling us looking for
equipment that can actually monitor for
compliance.
We have to reach GSA and the HVAC
types involved to put some common
sense into this thing. They will NEVER
be able to monitor CO at 9 ppm or
HCHO at 0.1 ppm for the price they are
used to paying. ❑
Michael D. Shaw is executive VP and director of marketing for Interscan
Corp., a provider of gas detection solutions.
For more, go to www.gasdetection.
com. To ask him a gas detection
or industrial hygiene related question,
email him at mike@fsmmag.com.