Facility managers today understand the importance of linking
facility management to their business’s overall strategy.
Still, many have difficulty finding the time or resources to devote
to developing a strategic facility plan.
To help the International Facility Management Association has
released a white paper that provides information on the strategic
facility planning process, its requirements and benefits, and gives facility
managers the basic tools to launch and successfully complete
a strategic facility plan.
“Strategic Facility Planning: A White Paper,” outlines the key
principles of strategic facility planning and details all stages of the
process, including understanding, analyzing, planning and acting.
“Strategic facility planning’s ultimate purpose is to provide a
framework to link business strategy to capacity planning,” said Gary Broersma, director of strategic facility planning & development at
Covance and past chairman of the IFMA board of directors. “Well
written, flexible plans account for growth as well as contraction, providing
strategies for seizing opportunities and for reacting to economic
downturns.”
The new white paper defines what strategic facility planning is
and what it is not, using accepted business planning methodology
and applying it to facility capital planning. It presents a four step facility
planning process that is clear, concise and repeatable, while
recommending tools that can assist in each step of the process.
The strategic facility planning process can be defined as the
process by which a facility management organization envisions its future by linking its purpose to the strategy of the overall organization
and then developing goals, objectives and action plans to
achieve that future. The result of the strategic facility planning
process is the strategic facility plan.
The SFP is a two-to-five year plan encompassing the entire portfolio
of owned and/or leased space that sets strategic facility goals
based on the organization’s strategic objectives. Strategic facility
planning recognizes that every decision made in business planning
has a direct impact on an organization’s real estate assets and needs.
The purpose of the SFP plan, therefore, is to develop a flexible and
implementable plan based on the specific and unique considerations
of the individual business. A four-step process provides the general
format to accomplish this mission.
Understanding
Thoroughly understand the organization’s mission, vision, values
and goals. Many organizations follow a balanced scorecard of four
key measurements: financial performance; customer knowledge;
internal business processes; and learning and growth.
Analyzing
Use analytical techniques, such as SWOT analysis, SCAN, SLP or
scenario planning, to explore the range of possible futures and the
triggers used to analyze an organization’s facility needs.
Planning
Develop plans that meet the long-range needs of the organization.
At minimum, the SFP should be reviewed annually and further
updated periodically as conditions require.
Acting
Take actions as planned and implement the SFP. Feedback from
actions taken can be incorporated into the next plan and/or project to
provide continuous improvement to future SFPs. The cyclical nature
of constant planning for the changing future and adopting plans
along the way are normal events. These changes and updates must be
managed to ensure they are achievable.
Once the organization’s business plan has been established, and a
clear understanding of assets and capabilities has been gathered, it is
possible to identify which strategic business goals require a facility response.
Gap analysis is an appropriate tool to use for this comparison.
Essentially, the difference, or gap, is established between the current
situation and the analyzed and verified needs. This gap is the
area requiring more detailed planning. Gap analysis is a business resource
assessment tool that enables a company to compare its actual
performance with its potential performance.
For facility planning, this gap analysis compares existing space
and its condition to the needs of the organization. At its core are two
essential questions: Where are we? Where do we want to be?
The SFP can then be formulated to identify the types of facilities
needed, the best geographic location for these facilities, the expected
costs and a timeline for bringing them consistently in line with the
business plan goals.
Components of the strategic facility plan may include: Facility
portfolio analysis and documentation; condition surveys; building
and site usage, and capacity analysis; industry benchmark studies;
staff and technology projections over time; project identification; cost
projections; presentation materials for board approval; and a facility
development schedule.
The strategic facility plan guides a master plan by adding longrange
strategic analyses of project drivers and restrainers. The facility
manager does not make these assumptions in isolation, but rather
brings in detailed analyses from all units in the organization.
A gap analysis of current versus future requirements can be aided
through data collection prior to any analysis. These analyses might be
of labor pools, market conditions, transport geographies, logistics
and operational requirements, information technology plans and
analysis, organizational or personnel structure.
Although the SFP process model ends with the hand-off to a tactical
facility plan, the reality is that the process of strategic planning
should be neverending. Seldom does a building go untouched after it is built. A
facility may be evaluated several times during its lifetime. The
cost of the original planning, design and construction of a
building is only a small percentage of its total cost of
ownership (TCO).
As the reiterative process of
strategic facility planning continues over the lifetime of a
building, it is imperative that the facility manager take into
account it’s life cycle cost (LCC). LCC is the cost of the
building over its lifetime, in present value-terms, which
includes all costs associated with the planning, design,
construction, operations, maintenance and capital improvements
over time and ultimately the cost of disposition. This is
especially true in a multi-building setting.
With multiple buildings, there
will always be buildings in different states of condition, from
new to end of useful life. To properly develop an
all-encompassing SFP, the facility manager must consider the
total cost of each building—taking into account all of the sunk
costs to date, as described above, as well their current
functionality.
For more information or to
download a copy of “Strategic Facility Planning: A White Paper,”
go to www.ifma.org.